The Impact of Summative Assessment on Students’ Social and Emotional Learning in Moroccan Public Secondary Schools
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59573/emsj.9(1).2025.21Ключові слова:
summative assessment, secondary schools, social and emotional learning, impactАнотація
Despite many reforms to promote education quality in Morocco, assessment methods still target results and performances rather than competencies’ development. Educational policies have always been concerned with school and students’ performances based on summative assessment and standardized test results. The school’s mission is not limited to instruction and grades. The 21st century school needs to meet students’ psychological needs and to provide empowering learning environments. In this context, current assessment policies in Moroccan schools are based on making judgments targeting students’ results rather than the acquired competencies. Assessing students has become a compulsory practice that provides teachers and administration with grades and numbers void of meaning. However, assessment approaches have to challenge teachers’ conventional perceptions of assessment and create a free anxiety learning atmosphere. Assessment should be considered as a dynamic process implemented in a learner-centered environment that supports students’ social and emotional empowerment. In this perspective, this article discusses the impact of school grades on students' engagement and motivation as well as on their social and emotional learning through a quantitative study conducted among 1080 students in public secondary schools in order to reveal this impact and to shed light on the benefits of interactive and dynamic assessment in a social and emotional healthy setting. The study also analyzes secondary school teachers’ perceptions of summative assessment and grades.
Посилання
Andrade, H., & Cizek, G. J. (Eds.). (2010). Handbook of formative assessment. Routledge.
Berk, R.A. & Nanda, J. (2006). A randomized trial of humor effects on test anxiety and test performance. Humor: International Journal of Human Research, 19(4), 425-454.
Cassady, J.C., & Johnson, R.E. (2002). Cognitive test anxiety and academic performance. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27(2), 270-295.
Getty, S.R., Barron, K.E., & Hulleman, C.S. (2021). What is the role of motivation in social and emotional learning? In N. Yoder & A. Skoog-Hoffman (Eds.), Motivating the SEL Field Forward Through Equity (Advances in Motivation and Achievement, Vol. 21, pp. 23-41). Emerald Publishing Limited, Bingley. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0749-742320210000021002
Guskey, T.R. & Bailey, J.M. (2001). Developing grading and reporting systems for students learning. Corwim Press.
Harlen, W. & Crick, R.D. (2002). A systematic review of the impact of summative assessment and tests on students' motivation for learning (EPPI-Centre Review, version 1.1*). In Research Evidence in Education Library (Issue 1). London: EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education.
Konwar, B. Sarma, K., & Ojah, R. (2023). The impact of anxiety on academic achievement: a comprehensive review. Journal of Harbin Engineering University, 44(8), 151-158.
Malouff, J. M., & Thorsteinsson, E. B. (2016). Bias in grading: A meta-analysis of experimental research findings. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108(1), 1-15.
Morgan, C., Dunn, L., Parry, S., & O'Reilly, M. (2004). The student assessment handbook: New directions in traditional and online assessment. Routledge Falmer.
Perrenoud, P. (1995). La fabrication de l’excellence scolaire : du curriculum aux pratiques d’évaluation : vers une analyse de la réussite, de l’échec et des inégalités comme réalités construites par le système scolaire. Librairie DROZ S.A. Genève.
Pollio, M., & Hochbein, C. (2015). The association between standards-based grading and standardized test scores as an element of a high school reform model. Teachers College Record, 117(11), 1-28.
Prukalski, M.D. (2024). Teachers’ perceptions of the purpose of traditional grading and the influence of established school or district grading cultures, guidelines, and policies in Connecticut public middle schools. Presented to the Affiliated Faculty of The College of Graduate and Professional Studies at the University of New England https://dune.une.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1038&context=edu_diss
Santana, J. C., & Eccius-Wellmann, C. (2018). Gender Differences in Test Anxiety in High-Stakes English Proficiency Tests. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 15(1), 100-111.
Scallon, G. (1988). L’évaluation formative des apprentissages. Presses de l’Université Laval.
Steele, C. M. & Aronson, J. (1995). Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(5), 797-811.
Ventura, M. & Zeidner, M. (2010). Assessment in schools-Affective domain. In International Encyclopedia of Education (3rd ed.).
Weissberg, R.P. & Durlak, J.A. (2015). Social and emotional learning, Past, present, and future, In Handbook of Social and Emotional Learning: Research and Practice. Guilford Publications.
Zins, J. E. (Ed.). (2004). Building Academic Success on Social and Emotional Learning: What does the research say? Teachers College Press.
Завантаження
Опубліковано
Номер
Розділ
Ліцензія

Ця робота ліцензується відповідно до ліцензії Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Terms and conditions of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License apply to all published manuscripts. This Journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. This licence allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs and other platforms by providing appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
A competing interest exists when professional judgment concerning the validity of research is influenced by a secondary interest, such as financial gain. We require that our authors reveal all possible conflicts of interest in their submitted manuscripts.
The Editor reserves the right to shorten and adjust texts. Significant changes in the text will be agreed with the Authors.
ISSN 


